![Hispanic female lawyer in front of the court house.](https://i0.wp.com/nwsidebar.wsba.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/coluns-1200-GettyImages-1410256570.jpg?resize=749%2C500&ssl=1)
Court of Appeals Distinguishes ‘Injury’ from ‘Damages’ in Holding Malpractice Claim Time-Barred
The Washington Court of Appeals upheld the distinction between “injury” and “damages” in a legal malpractice claim in the case of Gill v. Hillier, emphasizing that the statute of limitations begins when the party is injured, even if they do not yet know the full extent of their damages. The ruling serves as a crucial reminder for clients to take prompt action when they believe they have been harmed by a lawyer’s negligence.
Read More…